What happens if you own the company, and you are also an employee? Can the company “require” you to incur specific expenses?
In the 2009 Adler decision, the Tax Court of Canada ruled that a sole shareholder was not “required” by his company to incur expenses, even though the employment contract said he was, since there were no consequences to his breaching the agreement. (He was not going to fire himself, for example.)
Although Adler was an Informal Procedure decision, meaning that it’s not legally binding on either the CRA or taxpayers, the CRA decided last year to start applying it. Beginning September 2017, the CRA wrote to many employees who were major or sole shareholders of their companies, and reassessed them to deny employment expenses.
This caused an uproar among small business owners and their advisors, and many complaints were made to the CRA about this interpretation. It would become impossible for any major shareholder to claim these deductions, because they could never prove that the employment contract “required” them to incur the expenses. Numerous taxpayers were planning to appeal this issue to the Tax Court of Canada, but whether they could win was very uncertain.
Fortunately, the CRA has now backed down, will no longer issue these reassessments, and will reverse those already issued. On February 20, 2018, the CRA issued a notice entitled “Employment expenses review”, stating: